I really don't mean this as an attack on you, but I have to say: Look at how narrow the majority was when Prop 8passed in California, then talk to me about the will of the majority. And as far as the will of the people not applying when judges don't want it to apply, there's a thing called constitutionality that's in play here. The same type of arguments could have been made if Prop 8 banned interracial marriage, or marriage on the basis of disability, or on the basis of any category you care to think of.

And religious or faith-based motivation for a vote doesn't make that vote illegitimate. Misinformed, maybe, but not illegitimate. It doesn't nullify our right to argue the decision either though, and some of us are religious too.